Friday, November 15, 2002 – Page A1
Doctors in Ontario say they are being bullied
by auditors for the provincial health plan who are reviewing
their previous billings and, in some cases, demanding hundreds
of thousands of dollars back.
One radiologist owes $800,000, according to
the Ontario Health Insurance Plan, about equal to his income
over four years.
Many doctors who have been investigated by
OHIP's Medical Review Committee are being treated for depression
and marital problems and are cashing in RRSPs and mortgaging
or selling homes to repay the money.
Some are considering leaving Canada because
of the new audit laws that took effect two years ago.
"I really honestly cannot do this any
more, but I love the work. So my [only choice is] that I go
to the States," said Irene Vanek, a Toronto neuro-ophthalmologist
who specializes in eye tumours.
The chairman of the Medical Review Committee,
Barney Giblon, said the process is fair and is returning millions
of tax dollars to provincial coffers.
OHIP computers red-flagged Dr. Vanek's practice
because it was billing for too many complex eye exams, even
though this is her specialty and doctors from across the province
send patients to her.
"What is too many? I do this for a living.
What am I supposed to do?" said Dr. Vanek, who has a
private practice and works at Toronto Western Hospital.
She estimates she will be asked to repay half
the money she has billed for nearly all the exams she has
conducted during the past two years, likely more than $100,000.
Tracey Tremayne-Lloyd, a lawyer representing
some of the doctors being audited, said her clients are being
"bullied," and some are having emotional breakdowns.
"I've seen several bankruptcies. Some
have closed their practices, have to take leave of absences
or go on sick leave," Ms. Tremayne-Lloyd said.
Doctors bill OHIP about $4.5-billion a year.
Audits have been conducted since the 1970s to make sure the
money is paid out properly. Fraud is uncovered in fewer than
1 per cent of these audits. These cases are turned over to
the Ontario Provincial Police. The Medical Review Committee's
cases are labelled "errors" in billing, or "unusual
billing patterns."
Two years ago, the process became more aggressive
under new legislation. Doctors who decide to appeal the results
of an audit must pay the costs of the audit, as well as interest
on the amount deemed owing back to the time of investigation.
This means that doctors who appeal could owe an extra $20,000
to $40,000.
"To our doctors it feels that they've
basically put a gun to the head and said 'Pay up or we'll
shoot. Pay me now without complaint or it will be double what
I'm telling you if you complain,' " Ms. Tremayne-Lloyd
said.
Anthony Hsu, a pediatrician working in Welland,
an underserviced area attempting to recruit doctors, sees
patients in his office and is on call at the local hospital
every other day and every other weekend. OHIP flagged his
practice because it had a high volume of patients and Dr.
Hsu was performing more general checkups than the average
pediatrician.
The medical review team surveyed 40 patient
records and determined that while Dr. Hsu had billed for general
assessments or checkups, he had not kept enough notes about
those examinations.
Because of this, the team ruled he had not
done the full checkup and ordered him to repay most of his
billings for two years.
"In my office, when I am under pressure,
I often write notes down on different pages. But patients
ask many questions. I talk to them. I take the notes that
are necessary," Dr. Hsu said, his voice breaking with
emotion.
"It is very shameful for me and it is
accusing me of stealing from the public purse. I did not."
Dr. Hsu was ordered to repay $79,943 for the
visits, $20,119 in interest going back to the start of the
probe four years earlier and $8,100 for the audit for a total
of $108,162.
If he appeals, OHIP will deduct this amount
from his billings during the next 12 months, something he
felt he could not afford with a family and an office staff
of two. So Dr. Hsu cashed in his RRSPs and paid the bill.
A world-renowned radiologist was ordered to
repay $800,000, about 100 per cent of his income for four
years, because the auditors disagreed with how he billed for
some diagnostic procedures. The doctor's lawyer says that
he has been left nearly penniless.
Dr. Giblon said he thinks the process is fair.