|
VOLUME
36, NO. 15, April 18, 2000
Ontarians
'startlingly unaware' what GPs are paid
By
Matt Borsellino
Once inflated view of earnings
is corrected, most recommend pay increase
TORONTO - Ontarians are startlingly
unaware of how much their GPs are paid, a survey commissioned
by the Coalition of Family Physicians (COFP) has concluded.
The poll by Northstar Research
Partners, which cost nearly $10,000, comes at a sensitive
time as negotiators for the Ontario Medical Association and
provincial health ministry are said to be closing in on a
deal. Primary care reform has been at the centre of much of
those talks.
Ontarians have a "very
inflated view" of what family doctors are paid for specific
services on an hourly basis and in terms of take-home income,
the COFP survey found. When that impression is corrected,
however, most would recommend an average 8% pay increase for
the province's 10,000 or so GPs.
COFP president Dr. Sharla Lichtman
said during an interview she doesn't know whether the survey
will have any impact on negotiations at such a late stage.
"But this is the first
step toward dispelling some of the myths about family physicians
that are out there," she noted.
Ontarians believe family doctors
need to be paid fairly, Dr. Lichtman added, and the COFP was
interested in finding out how they really feel about GPs.
"How can we start a useful
dialogue if they aren't very well informed? It's clear we
need to start making more information available to the public,"
she said.
According to the survey, 84%
of Ontarians believe their family doctor is overpaid or fairly
paid.
Patients over-estimated the
rate for an intermediate assessment, one of the Ontario Health
Insurance Plan's most billed codes, by 300%. They over-estimated
payment for general assessments by 200%.
They thought money paid on
an hourly basis was double what it really is. And 63% said
GPs are paid an average of $69 to refer patients to specialists,
review and copy charts and test results, and ensure everyone
involved gets those documents. Family doctors are actually
paid nothing for such work.
"Given the public's inflated
view of what family physicians actually are remunerated, perhaps
it isn't surprising that Ontarians feel their family physicians
are paid fairly," survey officials concluded in their
key findings.
The impression of fairness,
though, changed significantly when survey participants were
told that fees have increased 3.25% since 1992, while inflation
ran 10.5% over that span. Participants then suggested an average
raise of 7.9% would be a fair increase.
Further, there's strong agreement
that unless GPs are treated fairly in any upcoming wage deal,
a number will either leave the province or the profession
altogether, exacerbating current shortages now reported by
nearly three dozen communities in both rural and urban areas
of the province.
In fact, the survey found a
co-relation between those who view their GP favorably and
those who view the provincial health-care system the same
way.
Some of the survey's other
findings:
|
95%
said they have a favorable impression of their family
doctor; |
|
75%
agree that at a time when the provincial economy is doing
well, it's only fair GPs receive increases "something
more than adjustments to cover recent increases in the
cost of living;" |
|
while
94% of Ontarians say they have a family doctor, 87% actually
visited their GP during the past year; |
|
participants
in the survey believe family doctors spend an average
of nearly 38% of their revenue on practice overhead (Ontario's
resource-based relative value schedule commission has
used 40% as the benchmark); and |
|
access
to GPs "doesn't appear to be a problem."
|
Dr. Lichtman cautioned the
last point can be interpreted a number of ways. Identifying
their GP is not always the same as being able to access one,
she said.
"I have patients who come
to my office (in Thornhill north of Toronto) from Barrie and
Windsor because they can't find a family doctor where they
live," she noted.
The COFP has also begun publishing
a series of letters from grassroots doctors across the province
believing "it's time the government, OMA and public understand
how front line providers . . . view the impending and dangerous
changes being proposed."
Most GPs in Ontario aren't
interested in capitation, rostering and contracts, "not
even a little bit," states a letter, from Dr. Stephen
Blanchard of Picton. (Surveys done by the Canada Health Monitor
in 1995 and 1997, however, show that more than 80% of Canadians
support the concept of patients registering with a family
doctor.)
"I resent the implication
that family physicians are partially responsible for the current
health-care/emergency crisis," he wrote. "I also
resent the idea that the 'solution' is to force us into the
proposed primary care reform set-up when the real cause of
the problem is poor family physician supply largely due to
government cutbacks and general underfunding of the system
and of primary care in particular."
The short supply of GPs gives
them "significant bargaining power" in Dr. Blanchard's
opinion.
"However, it appears organizations
that are supposed to represent us seem not to realize this
since they appear so willing to actively go along with government's
vision of our future. If we, the family doctors in the trenches,
don't like what the government and OMA have planned for us,
we need to take time from our hectic schedules to urgently
notify the OMA of our opinions."
|